--- Log opened Thu Feb 03 00:00:48 2005
00:02 < CIA-8> rene * r5945 /trunk/package/editors/elvis-tiny/elvis-tiny.desc: 
00:02 < CIA-8> * marked elvis-tiny to build in stage 5 (not 1+3) - I shuffle the
00:02 < CIA-8>  build stages in the psion-pda target now as I wish
00:15 < rxr> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 252356 Feb  3 00:14 rsync
00:15 < rxr> ^- arm dietlibc cross ;-)
00:17 < mnemoc> rsync??!
00:19 < rxr> yeah - thought it might be a nice option to sync my notes over the IRDA port ...
00:19 < rxr> but it looks far too huge ...
00:19 < rxr> but at least it is dietlibc able now ...
00:20 < _Ragnar_> static link?
00:21 < rxr> yep
00:21 < _Ragnar_> ah okay
00:21 < mnemoc> .oO( dietlibc use-it package selection will get loooooonger )o
00:21 < mnemoc> rxr: is it too expensive to have it dynamic?
00:21 < rxr> mnemoc: yep - why .oO ?
00:22 < rxr> when  we (at ROCK times) adapted to diet it was static only
00:22 < rxr> only later x86 dynamic support was added
00:22 < rxr> then arm and now x86-64
00:22 < mnemoc> on Config we select one by one which files do we want to build againts diet
00:22 < rxr> I think the other arches still have no dynamic support
00:22 < mnemoc> s/files/packages/
00:22 < rxr> yep - I know
00:22 < rxr> why .oO?
00:23 < mnemoc> the list is long
00:23 < mnemoc> and you are improving it to be even longer
00:23 < rxr> yep ;-)
00:23 < rxr> dietlibc is soo cute - lowfat and clean ;-)
00:23 < CIA-8> rene * r5946 /trunk/package/ (2 files in 2 dirs): 
00:23 < CIA-8> * added patch to support building rsync with dietlibc - and marked
00:23 < CIA-8>  it DIETLIBC ready
00:24 < rxr> I want dietlibc only systems soonder than later ..
00:24 < rxr> *g*
00:24 < mnemoc> rxr: that's why i prefer pure systems, LIBC=dietlibc not mixed s.th
00:24 < rxr> when I claned the dietlibc stuff (read reimplemented to be less hacky and ugly)
00:24 < _Ragnar_> what keeps you?
00:24 < rxr> lack of packages building with it ;-)
00:25 < rxr> when I reimplemented the diet stuff more packages should build without hacking - maybe we would then rather define tested uclibc and dietlibc selection templates - in contrast to adding FLAGS over all the pacag
00:25 < rxr> es
00:25 < mnemoc> rxr: to be static is just an option with can be forced for some archs ;)
00:26 < rxr> sure
00:26 < rxr> there already is that option in the config ...
00:26 < _Ragnar_> it doesn't work for some packages tho
00:26 < mnemoc> rxr: _Ragnar_ is trying to build everything against uclibc and it seems to work
00:26 < mnemoc> :(
00:26 < _Ragnar_> I'm not building static
00:26 < mnemoc> i have to go
00:27 < mnemoc> i know
00:27 < rxr> cu mnemoc 
00:27 < _Ragnar_> awww kay
00:27 < rxr> ucibc is full of compat cut'n paste
00:27 < rxr> although neither POSIX nor any other standard
00:27 < rxr> such stuff is not in dietlibc - and if it is it is #ifdef'ed _GNU_SOURCE _BSD_SOURCE
00:27 < rxr> thus the dietlibc/parse-config is full of
00:27 < rxr> nvi)
00:28 < rxr> var_append GCC_OPTIONS_APPEND " " "-D_GNU_SOURCE"
00:28 < rxr> and co to get those packags build
00:28 < rxr> this is why more stuff just builds with uclibc and needs at least some define injections with dietlibc
00:29 < rxr> also C++ stuff might not yet fully work with dietlibc  - so dietlibc only systems will be some bigger task not finished tomorrow ...
00:30 < rxr> _Ragnar_: what is the uclibc target triplet?
00:30 < rxr> i386-linux-t2-uclibc or so ?
00:30 < _Ragnar_> ix86-t2-linux-uclibc
00:30 < rxr> ix86 ?
00:31 < _Ragnar_> i686 in my case
00:31 < rxr> ah - ok ;-)
00:43 < rxr> UPN Officially Cancels 'Star Trek: Enterprise' ???
00:43 < rxr> didn't the announced last year that they have signed the full 8 seasons ...
00:56 < rxr> my PDA target has this buildtime:
00:56 < rxr> real 20m39.704s
00:56 < rxr> user 14m7.435s
00:56 < rxr> sys 4m4.398s
00:56 < rxr> 17 builds total, 17 completed fine, 0 with errors.
00:56 < rxr> on a 2.5Ghz Athlon ;-)
00:56 < rxr> n8 all
00:57 < _Ragnar_> gn8
02:27 < mnemoc> re
02:28 < _Ragnar_> re
02:29 < _Ragnar_> hmm does newer gcc/g++ have a different exception handling?
02:29 < mnemoc> no idea
02:29 < mnemoc> why?
02:29  * _Ragnar_ has a problem with cross-compiling an app with mingw
02:30 < _Ragnar_> my exceptions don't get caught at all
02:37 < mnemoc> o_O
04:35 -!- rxr_ [~rene@p213.54.201.251.tisdip.tiscali.de] has joined #t2
04:35 -!- Topic for #t2: T2 | 2.1.0-beta2 RELEASED | The next generation of System Development Enviroments (SDE) | http://www.t2-project.org/ | CIA, don't ever leave us again!
04:35 -!- Topic set by mnemoc [] [Wed Jan 12 03:04:43 2005]
04:35 [Users #t2]
04:35 [ _Ragnar_] [ daja77] [ mnemoc] [ nzg ] [ praenti] [ rxr_    ] 
04:35 [ CIA-8   ] [ jsaw  ] [ mtr   ] [ ooo_] [ rxr    ] [ valentin] 
04:35 -!- Irssi: #t2: Total of 12 nicks [0 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 12 normal]
04:35 -!- Channel #t2 created Sun Aug  8 21:15:33 2004
04:35 -!- rxr [~rene@p213.54.197.108.tisdip.tiscali.de] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]
04:35 -!- [freenode-info] why register and identify?  your IRC nick is how people know you.  http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#nicksetup
04:35 -!- Irssi: Join to #t2 was synced in 10 secs
04:43 -!- mtr_ [~michael@Ha22a.h.pppool.de] has joined #t2
04:44 -!- ideal [~idealm@211.100.227.107] has joined #t2
04:52 -!- mtr [~michael@H8616.h.pppool.de] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)]
05:36 -!- ideal [~idealm@211.100.227.107] has quit [Client Quit]
05:49 -!- ideal [~idealm@211.100.227.107] has joined #t2
07:17 -!- mnemoc_ [~amery@200.75.27.43] has joined #t2
07:17 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.27.32] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)]
08:07 -!- Netsplit over, joins: praenti
08:07 -!- Netsplit kornbluth.freenode.net <-> irc.freenode.net quits: valentin, daja77, mnemoc_, _Ragnar_, nzg, ideal
08:08 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.27.43] has joined #t2
08:09 -!- _Ragnar_ [loki@66-146-166-62.skyriver.net] has joined #t2
08:09 -!- daja77 [[68kg0qZ1V@odoaker.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de] has joined #t2
08:12 -!- ideal [~idealm@211.100.227.107] has joined #t2
08:13 -!- valentin [~valentin@port-212-202-42-228.dynamic.qsc.de] has joined #t2
08:13 -!- nzg [~tschmidt@xchangecenter.de] has joined #t2
08:15 -!- Netsplit kornbluth.freenode.net <-> irc.freenode.net quits: daja77, _Ragnar_
08:16 -!- Netsplit over, joins: _Ragnar_, daja77
08:17 < rxr_> moin
08:17 -!- You're now known as rxr
08:33 -!- Netsplit kornbluth.freenode.net <-> irc.freenode.net quits: mnemoc
08:33 -!- Netsplit kornbluth.freenode.net <-> irc.freenode.net quits: valentin, nzg, ideal
08:36 -!- Netsplit over, joins: nzg
08:36 -!- Netsplit over, joins: mnemoc
08:36 -!- Netsplit over, joins: valentin
08:42 -!- madtux [~mike@65.182.14.165] has joined #t2
08:42 < madtux> re
08:42 < rxr> hi madtux 
08:43 < madtux> guten morgen mein freund :)
08:44 < rxr> good morning over there ;-)
08:45 < madtux> well its just 1:45am here.. but thanks :)
08:48 < _Ragnar_> hi
08:50 -!- ideal [~idealm@211.100.227.107] has joined #t2
08:50 < rxr> madtux: hehe - sorry I'm so sleepy and writing some article stuff that I forgot about that ...
08:50 < rxr> moin _Ragnar_ 
08:50 < rxr> welcome ideal 
08:51 < _Ragnar_> ;)
08:51 < _Ragnar_> moin
08:52 < madtux> helo _Ragnar_ and ideal
08:52 < madtux> rxr, its ok.. i'm currently downloading some packages..
08:52 < madtux> just got 2 new servers which are not yet going live for production
08:52 < madtux> so i will use them for building processes
08:56 < _Ragnar_> ;)
08:57 < madtux> 2x 2.8GHZ xeon, 2x 73 15k rpm scsi, 4gb mem
08:57 < madtux> that shall be enough
08:57 < madtux> ah well thats it for tonight i must sleep
08:57 < madtux> night all 
08:58 -!- madtux [~mike@65.182.14.165] has quit ["Leaving"]
09:02 -!- mtr_ is now known as mtr
09:02 < mtr> hi
09:04 < mtr> ncurses/cross-build.patch does interfere with a uclibc ncurses patch
09:04 < mtr> !> Apply patch /work/rock/t2-work/package/base/uclibc/patch ..
09:04 < mtr> !> patching file ncurses/Makefile.in
09:04 < mtr> !> Hunk #1 FAILED at 93.
09:04 < _Ragnar_> ;p
09:07 < mtr> hmm, eventually the ncurses cross-build.patch should not be applied in general?
09:08 < _Ragnar_> that's why I tried to confine any changed to the uclibc/patches, instead of putting patches into the packages themselves
09:08 < _Ragnar_> changes*
09:09 < rxr> hm
09:09  * rxr looking what this uclibc patch does. ..
09:09 < rxr> maybe s.th. quite simillar ...
09:10 < rxr> hm - ic
09:11 < rxr> r5661 | mnemoc | 2005-01-19 04:08:31 +0100 (Wed, 19 Jan 2005) | 2 lines
09:11 < rxr> 	* added uclibc patch and hack to build ncurses
09:11 < rxr> hm
09:13 < rxr> _Ragnar_: mtr can you try if ncurses builds with uclibc when you remove the non applying patch from uclibc ?
09:13 < _Ragnar_> uhm
09:13 < mtr> hmm
09:13 < _Ragnar_> but including your patch?
09:13 < rxr> yes
09:14 < rxr> the one placed in the ncurses package
09:18 < _Ragnar_> both the patch and the .conf fix, or just the patch?
09:22  * _Ragnar_ pokes rxr 
09:22 < mtr> defining _GNU_SOURCE and NDEBUG should be safe, and -I../include is set in cross-build.patch, too
09:23 < mtr> oh, wait
09:23 < mtr> == 02/03/05 09:21:24 =[1]=> Aborted building package ncurses
09:23 < mtr> just removing the uclibc patch does not work
09:25 < jsaw> re
09:25  * mtr disabling now the other patch ...
09:25 < jsaw> rxr: 5am??? you were a bit late, ain't you?
09:25 < mtr> hi jsaw
09:25 < jsaw> hi mtr 
09:26 < jsaw> hi _Ragnar_ 
09:26 < _Ragnar_> hi jsaw 
09:28 < mtr> _Ragnar_, i have two more packages for uclibc_fix_configsub, do you mind if i commit ?
09:29 < _Ragnar_> mtr: hmmm I was going to remove most of the cases for that and substitute with a general find for configure/config.sub
09:30 < mtr> yes, i read about this, therefore i asked
09:30 < _Ragnar_> which seems to work pretty well
09:31 < _Ragnar_> but I really need to go through the build logs first and see if there are more hidden errors
09:31 < _Ragnar_> before I commit that
09:31 < mtr> so, just waiting for your commit
09:33 < _Ragnar_> okay
09:33 < _Ragnar_> what packages/target are you building
09:33 < _Ragnar_> ?
09:34 < mtr> some packages for my dvb-harddisc-recorder system, like mplayer vdr libdvdnnn and such
09:34 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.27.43] has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)]
09:35 < mtr> == 02/03/05 09:33:55 =[1]=> Finished building package ncurses
09:36 < rxr> do you svn rm the ncurses patch and commit?
09:36 < mtr> do you want me to do this?
09:38 < _Ragnar_> which patch?
09:39 < _Ragnar_> imho, the uclibc one shouldn't be removed until it's worked around
09:40 < _Ragnar_> but I need to get to bed
09:41 < _Ragnar_> rxr: does the uclibc ncurses patch fix the general crossbuild case?
09:42 < _Ragnar_> anyway, nini
09:43 < mtr> ok, my uboot target continues to build, afk
09:43 < mtr> gn8 _Ragnar_ 
09:43 < _Ragnar_> gn8
09:44 < rxr> _Ragnar_: the patch I comitted fixes it in general
09:45 < rxr> I had no idea that uclibc tinker s.th. abroad ...
09:47 < CIA-8> rene * r5947 /trunk/package/base/uclibc/patches/ (ncurses-100-buildccflags.patch ncurses.conf): 
09:47 < CIA-8> * removed uclibc ncurses patches (should be fixed by my generic cross
09:47 < CIA-8>  build fixes to ncurses yesterday - the .patch removal was tested,
09:47 < CIA-8>  however the .conf was not - but I'm confident it will work without)
09:47 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.27.6] has joined #t2
09:48 < rxr> moin mnemoc 
10:24 < rxr> Sun vergibt Service-Vertrag für interne Softwarewartung an CSC
10:24 < rxr> ???
11:03 < rxr> hm - my good old U5 still running 32bit userspace from ROCK times just fucked up ..
11:03 < rxr> I was no longer to write to any filesystem
11:03 < rxr> before the U160 IBM SCSI disk made some strange noice
11:03 < rxr> a reboot seems to cured that ..
11:03  * rxr headshake
11:04 < rxr> or not
11:04 < rxr> damn
11:04 < rxr> ah
11:04 < rxr> the usual / 100% filled
11:04 < rxr> damn - why can't programs have more sensible error messages ...
11:07 -!- ideal [~idealm@211.100.227.107] has quit ["Leaving"]
11:12 -!- mtr [~michael@Ha22a.h.pppool.de] has quit [Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)]
11:23 -!- _Ragnar__ [loki@66-146-166-62.skyriver.net] has joined #t2
11:23 -!- _Ragnar_ [loki@66-146-166-62.skyriver.net] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]
11:44 < rxr> oh - it seems I got a 1.3 in assembly hackery ... *g*
12:01 < CIA-8> rene * r5948 /trunk/package/x11/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode.desc: * updated rxvt-unicode (4.7 -> 4.9)
12:30 < rxr> /home/rene/myrevo/a       2745      1226      1369  48% /mnt/misc
12:32 < rxr>  758467 Feb  3 12:45 initrd
12:47 < rxr> ok - the ARM binaries work
12:48  * rxr in a ash in this PDA ...
12:48 < rxr> no digicam - so no pics ...
13:28 < CIA-8> rene * r5949 /trunk/package/base/irda-utils/irda-utils.conf: * fixed irda-utils for cross builds
13:33 < CIA-8> rene * r5950 /trunk/package/base/dietlibc/parse-config-9: 
13:33 < CIA-8> * fixed the dietlibc arch_target redefine to be -dietlibc instead of
13:33 < CIA-8>  the ugly -gnulibc1. No idea how this could have be commited in the
13:33 < CIA-8>  first place ... My Psion PDA testcase builds with the new one.
13:35 < CIA-8> rene * r5951 /trunk/target/psion-pda/ (config.in parse-config): 
13:35 < CIA-8> * added iproute2 and irda-utils to the psion-pda target, as well
13:35 < CIA-8>  as a overwrite of install_init to prevent init scripts from beeing
13:35 < CIA-8>  instaslled
13:51 -!- mtr [~michael@H9b1f.h.pppool.de] has joined #t2
14:00 < rxr> dietlibc static vs. dynamic:
14:00 < rxr> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 2336 Feb  3 14:00 hello
14:00 < rxr> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 7908 Feb  3 14:00 hello-s
14:02 < rxr> vs. glibc:
14:02 < rxr> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root   2804 Feb  3 14:01 hello-glibc
14:02 < rxr> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 315792 Feb  3 14:01 hello-glibc-s
14:02 < rxr> *g*
14:35 < mnemoc> moin!
14:35 < rxr> moin!
14:36 < mnemoc> "fixed the dietlibc arch_target redefine to be -dietlibc" <--- this impact every config.sub file, and binutils mainly
14:42 < rxr> nothing does use dietlibc
14:42 < rxr> and I see now regression
14:43 < rxr> using one totally messed name with some normal official name should not screw anything up ...
14:43 < mnemoc> let see how does it go here
14:43 < rxr> mnemoc: can you remove the dietlibc/sincostan.patch before you start the build
14:43 < mnemoc> ok
14:43 < rxr> it does not work on x86 and I need to take a look how to only inject it for non x86 builds ...
14:43 < rxr> well - ok I have some idea .. but - test without the patch first ...
14:44 < mnemoc> do you want me to test a pure minimal/dietlibc or a bootdisk?
14:44 < rxr> bootdisk
14:44 < rxr> pure minimal is highly borked
14:44 < rxr> most probably did not worked for over a year already
14:44 < rxr> but I'm on the track to reimplement those bit in a way one would like to maintain
14:45 < rxr> the rock inherited dietlibc junk - is well - quite ugly ...
14:45 < mnemoc> the progress on T2/uclibc hit you :)
14:46 < rxr> yeah - and looking at the code (I guess esden injected) knocked me from the chair ...
14:47 < mnemoc> :)
14:49 < mnemoc> package/base/uclibc/patches/ncurses-100-buildccflags.patch <--- uhm?
14:49 < mnemoc> why deleted?
14:50 < mnemoc> log read
14:52 < mnemoc> Upgrade Patch for postfix (package/mail/postfix): 2.0.20 -> 2.1.5
14:52 < mnemoc> err
14:52 < mnemoc> sorry
14:55 < rxr> mnemoc: conflict with my general cross fix ..
14:55 < mnemoc> rxr: do you know if iptables-1.3 is backward compatible
14:55 < rxr> should build without
14:55 < rxr> no
14:56 < rxr> never heared of that one ...
14:56 < mnemoc> don't know or it's not?
14:56 < mnemoc> ok
14:56 < rxr> is it new?
14:56 < rxr> (than I can earn money posting the news ...)
14:56 < mnemoc> 2005-Feb-01: iptables-1.3.0rc1
14:56 < mnemoc> Finally, the first 1.3.0 release candidate is released. If you've been looking for tremendous ruleset update performance improvements, this is the way to go. 
14:57 < rxr> no idea what is new ...
14:58 < rxr> arm-t2-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lc 
14:59 < rxr> ^- dietlibc dynamic for arm
15:05 < mnemoc> uhm
15:11 < rxr> ok - our wrappers fult
15:11 < rxr> fault
15:11 < rxr> s.th. is inserting static
15:11 < rxr> and then gcc only looks for libc.a ....
15:12 < mnemoc> ximina evolution died?
15:12 < rxr> what ?
15:13 < mnemoc> www.ximian.com/products/ximian_evolution/ redirects to a 'buy it' at novell
15:13 < rxr> hehe
15:15 < rxr> so - when my dietlibc builds dynamic for arm now - I'll be off for lunch
15:15 < rxr> yeah
15:15 < rxr> == 02/03/05 15:15:45 =[1]=> Finished building package dietlibc.
15:16 < rxr> ok - that looks dynamic:
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libc.a
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libc.so
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libcompat.a
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libcompat.so
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libcrypt.a
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libdl.so
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/liblatin1.a
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libm.a
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libm.so
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libpthread.a
15:16 < rxr> dietlibc: usr/dietlibc/lib-arm/libpthread.so
15:18 < mnemoc> :)
15:19 < CIA-8> rene * r5952 /trunk/package/base/dietlibc/dietlibc.conf: 
15:19 < CIA-8> * fixed dietlibc to also build the -dyn wrapper (using the system libc)
15:19 < CIA-8> * removed some more || true nonone wants in a .conf
15:19 < CIA-8> * fixed a variable name typo I introduced a few weeks ago and refixed
15:19 < CIA-8>  build accoringly
15:19 < CIA-8> * indenting cleanups
15:19 < CIA-8>  (sorry - only tested to cross build with the dynamic part on ARM)
15:19 < rxr> == 02/03/05 15:19:08 =[1]=> Finished building package gzip.
15:19 < rxr> ^- dynamic arm
15:22 < CIA-8> rene * r5953 /trunk/package/shells/zsh/zsh.desc: * updated zsh (4.2.1 -> 4.2.4)
15:26 < rxr> ouhm
15:26 < rxr> seems I should quickly do some libm work for dietlibc:
15:26 < rxr> undefined reference to `log'
15:26 < rxr> undefined reference to `sqrt'
15:26 < rxr> undefined reference to `floor'
15:26 < rxr> undefined reference to `fmod'
15:26 < rxr> undefined reference to `__half'
15:26 < rxr> undefined reference to `exp'
15:28  * rxr off - lunch - and doing a test bootdisk x86 build to see what breaks ...
15:28 < mtr> hi
15:29 < mnemoc> hi mtr
15:29 < mtr> hi mnemoc 
15:35 < mnemoc> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:48:47AM -0300, Alejandro Mery wrote:
15:35 < mnemoc> >> hi, i'm trying to build a non-NLS system which of course doesn't have 
15:35 < mnemoc> >> iconv.h. but buffer.h wants it.
15:35 < mnemoc> I'd just install libiconv. If you really want to build lftp without it,
15:35 < mnemoc> add a bunch of #ifdef's to sources, then send me the resulting patch.
15:35 < mnemoc> -- Alexander. 
15:35 < mnemoc> snif snif
15:54 -!- madtux [~mike@196.40.44.28] has joined #t2
15:54 < madtux> hi
15:54 < mnemoc> hi mightytux
16:14 < madtux> hi mnemoc 
17:19 -!- _Ragnar__ is now known as _Ragnar_
17:23 < mnemoc> _Ragnar_: OT question, what 'to be fly' means?
17:23 < _Ragnar_> no 'on the fly'?
17:23 < mnemoc> nope
17:24 < mnemoc> "i'm preaty fly for a white guy", on a song
17:24 < _Ragnar_> no clue
17:24 < mnemoc> offspring
17:25 < daja77> ;)
17:26 < mnemoc> _Ragnar_: isn't that your native language? :(
17:26 < mnemoc> "And all the girlies say I'm pretty fly for a white guy"
17:26 < mnemoc> ive it to me baby, uh huh, uh huh
17:26 < mnemoc> Give it to me baby, uh huh, uh huh
17:26 < mnemoc> :\
17:26 < mnemoc> music
17:27 < _Ragnar_> wordnets says: fly (n):
17:27 < _Ragnar_>      4: (baseball) a hit that flies up in the air [syn: {fly ball}]
17:28 < mnemoc> how that definition applies to the sense??
17:29 < _Ragnar_> like 'I'm a hit'
17:29 < _Ragnar_> tho I kinda doubt offspring would do such play on words
17:29 < _Ragnar_> you sure they don't sing 'sly' ?
17:30 < mnemoc> http://www.lyrics007.com/Offspring%20Lyrics/Pretty%20Fly%20(For%20A%20White%20Guy)%20Lyrics.html
17:31 < _Ragnar_> *shrugs*
17:31 < _Ragnar_> no clue then aside from the one I already gave
17:34 < mnemoc> what 'to be a hit' means?
17:52 < rxr> rehi
17:52 < mnemoc> hi rxr
17:55 < CIA-8> rene * r5954 /trunk/package/base/linux24/arch-sparc64-atomic.patch: * well - arch-sparc64-atomic.patch does not apply to linux24 ...
18:04 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.27.6] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]
18:30 -!- madtux [~mike@196.40.44.28] has quit ["Lost terminal"]
19:02 < _Ragnar_> hi
19:02 < rxr> == 02/03/05 19:00:21 =[1]=> Finished building package ncurses.
19:03 < rxr> ^- dietlibc arm - libm hacked ncurses ...
19:03 < rxr> libm of dietlibc hacked for ncurses that is ...
19:04 < _Ragnar_> uh huh
19:08 < _Ragnar_> 1-ncurses still fails with uclibc
19:08 < rxr> I did nothing to it so far
19:08 < rxr> can you provide the full error log to me ?
19:09 < _Ragnar_> http://66.146.166.62/~loki/1-ncurses.err
19:14 < rxr> this happens in the ncurses rebuid with wide char support
19:14 < rxr> can you take a look why the type is undefined there and if you have in from uclibc ?
19:15 < rxr> maybe it just build accidently before because the former patched crutially redefined some CCPFLAGS stuff maybe resulting in the 2nd build beeing a normal (not wide but narrow) ncurses build ...
19:15 < rxr> if you do not have this type we could just disable the ncursesw build for uclibc as I did for dietlibc ...
19:17 < CIA-8> rene * r5955 /trunk/package/security/openssl/openssl.conf: * fixed openssl build for arm (added target to the case ...)
19:18 < _Ragnar_> uhm okay
19:20 < _Ragnar_> rxr: ncurses should define that type itself
19:20 < rxr> ouhm ok
19:21 < _Ragnar_> so this is more likely to mean wrong header files get included...
19:21 < rxr> i take a look
19:22 < _Ragnar_> it depends on _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED being defined
19:23 < _Ragnar_> which should get defined with _GNU_SOURCE
19:46  * rxr soon taking a lookg
19:46 < rxr> my brother phoned and then some commerial s.th. wanted to sell newspaper abos ...
19:46 < rxr> busy hour ...
19:46 < rxr> when openssl builds I'll take a look into ncurses
19:50 < rxr> yeah
19:50 < rxr> openssl built for arm with dynamic dietlibc ...
19:50 < rxr> + it is a cross build ...
19:51 < rxr> so - now I test some openssl.conf cleanup
20:32 < _Ragnar_> rxr: did you fix the ncurses thingy?
20:32 < rxr> not et
20:33 < rxr> cleaning openssl up
20:34 < _Ragnar_> k
20:35 < rxr> oh my god is openssl huge: 947116
20:36 < rxr> ^- dynamic dietlibc arm
20:36 < rxr> 1188416 <- dynamic glibc x86
20:36 < rxr> so no ssl on my psion ;_)
20:36 < rxr> but good to know we can cross build openssl now ;-)
20:37 < rxr> and the .conf is not as amazingly ugly as it was before ...
20:37 < rxr> == 02/03/05 20:37:16 =[1]=> Finished building package openssl.
20:39 < jsaw> re
20:39 < rxr> hi jsaw 
20:39 < jsaw> hi rxr!
20:40 < _Ragnar_> did you patch that for dietlibc, or in general again (will it break uclibc)?
20:41 < rxr> I cleaned it up significantly ...
20:41 < rxr> it is cross build able now
20:42 < rxr> it should not break with other libc's ...
20:42 < rxr> in general I of course do not mangle packages due to dietlibc - all dietlibc junk will go into packge/base/dietlibc/....
20:42 < _Ragnar_> okay ;)
20:43 < rxr> it is just that ncurses was broken in general - and openssl.conf so ugly that I could not sleep well with that in t2 
20:45 < _Ragnar_> *lol* I see
20:45 < rxr> as in you just looked into it ?
20:48 < _Ragnar_> what's so ugly about it?
20:48 < rxr> custmain
20:48 < rxr> ugly /etc/ssl symlinking to get files into /usr
20:48 < rxr> and then the stuff it not root / DESTDIR save and just overwrites the bulid system's /usr and so on
20:49 < _Ragnar_> yeah I see now
20:49 < _Ragnar_> that sucks
20:50 < rxr> .oO
20:50 < rxr> we did not install the openssl man files properly before?
20:50 < rxr> !> Found shared files with other packages:
20:50 < rxr> !> usr/share/man/man1/passwd.1: openssl shadow
20:50 < rxr> !> usr/share/man/man3/buffer.3: libowfat openssl
20:50 < rxr> !> usr/share/man/man3/err.3: man-pages openssl
20:50 < rxr> !> usr/share/man/man3/rand.3: man-pages openssl
20:50 < rxr> !> usr/share/man/man3/threads.3: openssl perl
20:51 < rxr> *lol*
20:51 < _Ragnar_> uhm
20:51 < rxr> _Ragnar_: that we did not install the openssl manpages ? *g*
20:51 < _Ragnar_> sure?
20:51 < rxr> openssl: etc/ssl/man
20:51 < rxr> openssl: usr/share/doc/openssl/man
20:51 < rxr> openssl: usr/share/doc/openssl/man/man7
20:51 < rxr> openssl: usr/share/doc/openssl/man/man7/Modes of DES.7
20:51 < rxr> that is openssl on ROCK Linux 2.0.1 (2004/03/13)
20:52 < _Ragnar_> oh *lol*
20:53 < rxr> in my T2 working copy I get dozens installed
20:53 < rxr> and the above conflicts ...
20:54 < rxr> .o(why did I started to clean up openssl - why ...)
20:55 < _Ragnar_> =) good luck
20:56 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.28.126] has joined #t2
20:57 < mnemoc> back
20:57 < rxr> _Ragnar_: know that I spent so much time with openssl - might you liek to review ncurses ?
20:57 < mnemoc> did i miss too much?
20:57 < rxr> _Ragnar_: e.g. review if the uclibc patch added some  -I or so that we might like to add
20:57 < rxr> mnemoc: some bashing of the ROCK inherited openssl package and such - not much ...
20:58 < mnemoc> rxr: ncurses patch removes CFLAGS only
20:58 < rxr> my cross all and dietlibc making progress
20:58 < rxr> mnemoc: didn't it hardset some other option, too
20:58 < rxr> I'm sure I saw s.th. like that
20:58 < mnemoc> nope
20:58 < mnemoc> maybe mom
20:59 < _Ragnar_> mnemoc: the .conf does
20:59 < _Ragnar_> but that shouldn't affect it
20:59 < rxr> does or did *g* ?
20:59 < mnemoc> # svn merge -r5947:5946 .
20:59 < mnemoc> does
21:00 < mnemoc> # configure want BUILD_CPPFLAGS=CPPFLAGS which includes $xroot/usr/include, harmfull for BUILDCC
21:00 < mnemoc> export BUILD_CPPFLAGS="-I../include -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG"
21:00 < _Ragnar_> yes that defines GNU_SOURCE
21:00 < _Ragnar_> which we need her3e
21:00 < _Ragnar_> here*
21:01 < mnemoc>       7 -BUILD_CCFLAGS  = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I$(srcdir) @BUILD_CPPFLAGS@ @BUILD_CFLAGS@
21:01 < rxr> can you rephrase: what need to be readded to get it compile ?
21:01 < mnemoc>       8 +BUILD_CCFLAGS  = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I$(srcdir) @BUILD_CPPFLAGS@
21:01 < mnemoc> they are complementary
21:01 < mnemoc> some stuff on @BUILD_CFLAGS@ is harmfull
21:01 < mnemoc> some is necesary
21:02 < mnemoc> so i added the necesary stuff on BUILD_CPPFLAGS and removed BUILD_CFLAGS
21:03 < mnemoc> the comment tells the real problem
21:03 < rxr> can you point me to the exact variable that after my cleanup is a) present that shouod not be - or b) missing ?
21:03 < rxr> == 02/03/05 21:00:31 =[9]=> Finished building package openssl.
21:04 < mnemoc> me? no... i should start a new uclibc build
21:04 < mnemoc> and complete uboot
21:04 < mnemoc> i need some hours to get that point
21:05 < rxr> mnemoc: ok ok
21:05 < rxr> _Ragnar_: ?? *g*
21:05 < mnemoc> :p
21:05 < rxr> this one is big ->
21:05 < CIA-8> rene * r5956 /trunk/package/security/openssl/openssl.conf: (log message trimmed)
21:05 < CIA-8> * deep openssl.conf cleanup:
21:05 < CIA-8>  * do not use custmain
21:05 < CIA-8>  * do not do ugly symlinking
21:05 < CIA-8>  * really install the manpages
21:05 < CIA-8>  * be cross copmilable
21:05 < CIA-8>  * the forgotten bits
21:06 < rxr> ^- please test ;-)
21:06 < _Ragnar_> I can't right nw
21:06 < _Ragnar_> now*
21:06 < rxr> ok - no problem at all
21:06 < _Ragnar_> rxr: but what seems to be definitely missing from your flags is -D_GNU_SOURCE
21:07 < rxr> _Ragnar_: does it work when you ineject it to the patch
21:07 < rxr> mom
21:08 < mnemoc> rxr: is your patch postconf too?
21:08 < rxr> postconf ?
21:08 < rxr> Makefile.in ...
21:08 < mnemoc> great :p
21:08 < mnemoc> i patched Makefile directly :D
21:08 < rxr> _Ragnar_: does this work:
21:08 < rxr> --- cross-build.patch   (revision 5938)
21:08 < rxr> +++ cross-build.patch   (working copy)
21:08 < rxr> ...
21:09 < mnemoc> err
21:09 < rxr> -+BUILD_CCFLAGS = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I$(srcdir) -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I$(srcdir) -I. -I../include
21:09 < rxr> ++BUILD_CCFLAGS = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I$(srcdir) -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I$(srcdir) -I. -I../include -D_GNU_SOURCE
21:09 < mnemoc> rxr: i confused it with ncurses/bash problem
21:10 < _Ragnar_> building...
21:14 < mnemoc> any objections to imap_headercache patch on mutt?
21:14 < jsaw> ?
21:14 < mnemoc> hi jsaw 
21:14 < jsaw> hi mnemoc 
21:15 < mnemoc> i want to add that third party patch, objections?
21:15 < jsaw> i don't know it - so i simply trust you ;)
21:15 < mnemoc> :)
21:16 < _Ragnar_> rxr: ncurses builds with that patch
21:16 < mnemoc> :)
21:16 < jsaw> ack.
21:16 < jsaw> hi _Ragnar_ btw.
21:17 < rxr> hm -- shoudl I simply commit that hardcoding ... *g* ;-)
21:17 < jsaw> yep.
21:17 < _Ragnar_> yes
21:17 < _Ragnar_> hi jsaw 
21:18 < _Ragnar_> does the -D_GNU_SOURCE break dietlibc or glibc?
21:18 < rxr> _Ragnar_: we'll see ;-)
21:18 < CIA-8> rene * r5957 /trunk/package/base/ncurses/cross-build.patch: * define -D_GNU_SOURCE in ncurses BUILD_CCFLAGS to make uclibc happy
21:18 < jsaw> rxr: we have squashfs-tools, but no squashfs in kernel...?
21:19 < rxr> no - we could inject it if we would like to. ...
21:19 < rxr> jsaw: do you play with it ?
21:19 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5958 /trunk/package/mail/mutt/ (mutt.conf mutt.desc no_autogen_for_headercache.patch): 
21:19 < CIA-8> * updated mutt (1.4.2i -> 1.4.2.1i)
21:19 < CIA-8> * improved mutt with imap_headercache patch
21:19 < jsaw> no yet but soon. First I try to get it running with cramfs... 
21:19 < rxr> on which arch and hardware ?
21:20 < jsaw> target/distcc, x86/x86
21:21 < jsaw> maybe I should call ist distcccd...
21:21 < jsaw> -s
21:21 < rxr> distcd ;-)
21:21 < rxr> dist-tripple-c-d
21:21 < jsaw> distc^3d
21:21 < jsaw> ....
21:21 < jsaw> distcd is good! I like that.
21:22 < jsaw> I only have to insert an "u" for uclibc somewhere... *g*
21:22 < rxr> so the target name will be distkajdfghlksdjfhcd in the end
21:23 < rxr> encoding any package capital ...
21:23 < jsaw> rxr: btw, reading the squashfs page, seems like it's speed is quite good.
21:23 < jsaw> well I mean the comparison page
21:23 < rxr> it is read-only, you know that ?
21:23 < jsaw> wait...
21:23 < rxr> oehrm
21:24 < jsaw> looks like readonly
21:24 < rxr> jsaw: i only read about it in read-only ontect
21:25 < rxr> the compression write would be quite expensive for the squashfs design ...
21:25 < jsaw> right...
21:26 < rxr> I heavily patch dietlibc right now ...
21:27 < rxr> jsaw: how many mails are on the dietlibc list?
21:27 < rxr> I subscribed yesterday and got none so far ...
21:27 < jsaw> mails are very rare...
21:27 < rxr> .oO
21:28 < rxr> and the archive never worked ... :-(
21:28 < jsaw> last one was 1 Feb
21:28 < rxr> ok - thanks
21:28 < jsaw> hm, now gawk fails.
21:28 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5959 /trunk/package/ (network/ipvsadm/ security/ipvsadm/): * moved ipvsadm from security/ to network/ because basicly it's a tool to set routes
21:29 < rxr> there is some more stuff to sort
21:29 < rxr> e.g. the extra/ stuff as well as quite a lot of base that is not base ...
21:29 < rxr> == 02/03/05 21:29:14 =[1]=> Finished building package embutils.
21:29 < rxr> ^- ok - more dietlibc dyn fixed (failed due to pivot_root before)
21:29 < rxr> so /me evening dinner
21:29 < rxr> and then maybe preparing patches for fefe
21:29 < rxr> and then there is this libm stuff I should inject into dietlibc ...
21:30 < rxr> and - well - this money earning scanner driver thing :-(
21:30 < _Ragnar_> what did you inject into libm?
21:30 < rxr> dietlibc
21:30 < mnemoc> question: ipvsadm-1.21 is for 2.4 kernels only, ipvsadm-1.24 is for 2.6 kernels only. both kernels include ipvs code. our ipsvadm package has 1.24 and i got a patch to make 1.24 support .old as modutils. what do you propose?
21:30 < rxr> some infrastructure bits to get my arm binaries linked ...
21:31 < mnemoc> ipvsadm-1.24 as ipvsadm2 package? ipvsadm-1.21 as ipvsadm-$foo package?
21:31 < rxr> well - no idea
21:31 < mnemoc> both on ipsvadm package?
21:31 < rxr> I do not even know what the package does ...
21:31 < rxr> mnemoc: you are the maintainer? much fun throwing a coin ;-)
21:31 < mnemoc> :\
21:32 < rxr> if you need both - package both ;-)
21:32 < mnemoc> no more voting?
21:32 < rxr> configure:6152: checking compiler and flags for sanity
21:32 < rxr> configure:6156: error: cannot run test program while cross compiling
21:32 < rxr> ^- this is what openssl screams about ?!?!?!
21:32 < rxr> f*cking package
21:32  * rxr off for evening dinner ...
21:32 < mnemoc> LOL
21:35 < rxr> ok - stupid test patched away ...
21:35 < rxr> ok - zlib missing ...
21:37 < _Ragnar_> brb, food
21:38 < rxr> checking for zlib 1.1.4 or greater... configure: error: cannot run test program 
21:38 < rxr> while cross compiling
21:39 < rxr> ok - finally food 
21:44 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5960 /trunk/package/network/ipvsadm2/: * added ipvsadm2 package as a copy of ipvsadm
21:48 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5961 /trunk/package/network/ipvsadm2/ (6 files): * renamed ipvsadm2 files according to new $pkg name
22:04 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.28.126] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)]
22:07 -!- mnemoc [~amery@200.75.27.22] has joined #t2
22:08 < mnemoc> am i really here?
22:08 < daja77> seems so
22:08 < mnemoc> :D
22:09 < mnemoc> good
22:09 < mnemoc> hi daja77 
22:09 < mnemoc> rxr: here?
22:09 < daja77> hi mnemoc 
22:12 < mnemoc> rxr: i have a postlinux.conf dilema. ipvsadm needs _only_ net/ip_vs.h from kernel sources which is not on /usr/include. i) postlinux.conf to only copy that header? ii) ipvsadm/parse-config to copy that header iii) linux24.conf hardcoded copy of that header. ip_vs.{o,ko} is built always but both kernels. 
22:21 -!- ShinGouki [~bla@me-lewiston-pw-627.mint.adelphia.net] has joined #t2
22:21 -!- ShinGouki [~bla@me-lewiston-pw-627.mint.adelphia.net] has left #t2 []
22:41 < _Ragnar_> re
22:42 < mnemoc> re _Ragnar_ 
22:43 < _Ragnar_> what did I miss?
22:44 < mnemoc> no idea, my connection sticks today
22:46 < rxr> mnemoc: ouohm - can I think about that later - e.g. tomorrow ?
22:46 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5962 /trunk/package/network/ipvsadm2/pkg_linux-header_pre.conf: * added hook to install kernel's net/ip_vs.h if ipvsadm2 will be installed
22:47 < mnemoc> rxr: ok
22:47 < rxr> I see you already decided ... :-)
22:47 < mnemoc> the method can be changed
22:47 < mnemoc> i only want it building
22:52 < rxr> why the h*ll does openssh want to run so many test programs ...
22:52  * rxr headshake
22:57 < rxr> I give up to cross compile openssh shit right now
22:57 < rxr> I would not have imagined that this OpenBSD prime time project has such an ugly configure ...
22:58 < mnemoc> ipvsadm for 2.4 doens't build against 2.6 headers :(
22:59 < _Ragnar_> *g*
22:59 < rxr> inject the needed headers into the ipvsadm package ...
22:59 < rxr> using -I $PWD/include
22:59 < rxr> and drop the needed headers into it ...
22:59 < mnemoc> ok
23:00 < mnemoc> i'll do that for 2.4
23:00 < mnemoc> keepalived also needs it so i prefer 2.6's on /usr/include
23:00 -!- praenti [~praenti@82.139.198.99] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)]
23:00 -!- praenti [~praenti@82.139.198.99] has joined #t2
23:17 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5963 /trunk/package/network/ipvsadm/ (inject_2.4.29_ip_vs.h.patch ipvsadm.desc): * downdated ipvsadm (1.24 -> 1.21-11) to be ipvsadm for 2.4 kernels
23:39 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5964 /trunk/package/network/ (6 files in 2 dirs): * improved ipvsadm and ipvsadm2 to cohexist using .old suffix on ipvsadm tools when ipvsadm2 is installed
23:59 < CIA-8> mnemoc * r5965 /trunk/package/ (network/keepalived/ security/keepalived/): * moved keepalived from security/ to network/
--- Log closed Fri Feb 04 00:00:48 2005